Gorilla snot spray for hair skin#

Plus, Tessica Brown earns her living as an Instagram and TikTok Star. She will definitely have medical bills that will need to be covered. Her hair has remained “rock solid” for about a month. She’s now attempting a surgical procedure to remove the glue. The ER tried removing the glue with acetone, which caused scalp burns. DamagesĪnother aspect of a product liability case is determining whether the plaintiff suffered compensable damages.

Gorilla snot spray for hair skin#

Plus, “quick weaves or glue weaves” have been a well-known Black woman beauty secret for decades.Īll of these facts would seem to support the idea that Gorilla Glue probably should have foreseen that someone might try the product on their hair.Īnother major question might be whether the warning to avoid using the adhesive on skin already covers the use of the adhesive on hair, as the consumer might also reasonably foresee that glue on hair meant glue on the scalp. Brown’s preferred product is also marketed as “hair glue.” Plus, there is evidence to suggest Gorilla Glue leveraged the confusion between the two products to broaden its audience through pay-per-click advertising. Gorilla Glue’s labeling is orange and yellow. The gel even has yellow and orange labeling. While Gorilla Glue does not make the gel ( Midway Importing sells it here in the US, it’s a Mexican brand) the presence of that gel could prompt someone to foresee a mixup. So a major question at issue will be: could anyone have reasonably foreseen that someone might try to use Gorilla Glue Spray Adhesive on their hair? A plaintiff’s lawyer might argue that they absolutely could, as there is a product on the market called Gorilla Snot Gel. In New York, manufacturers also have a duty to warn of the danger of unintended uses of a product, provided those uses are reasonably foreseeable. In fact, product labeling and warnings are meant to help guard consumers against the kinds of lapses in judgment that Brown showed. In fact, the state of Louisiana, where the case will be tried, does state that manufacturers can be held liable for damages caused by a “reasonably anticipated use of the product.” Yes, this could be because nobody at the company ever thought for one moment that someone might deliberately spray superglue into their hair, but the company’s honest lack of foresight may not be able to save them if the courts find they knew or should have known that someone might make the attempt. While you may think it’s common sense that nobody ought to spray super glue into their hair, the facts of the case show that the product labeling specifically warns against using the glue on eyes, skin, or clothing but does not mention hair. What Should You Do If You’re in a Similar Situation?Ī failure to warn consumers about the dangerous use of a product can be a viable reason for a personal injury lawsuit.Should she decide to sue, does she actually have a viable lawsuit? Product Labeling Your first thought might have been: what on earth would possess someone to put super glue in their hair? You can rest assured if a lawsuit moves forward, it is not because a frivolous party decided to try to make a buck but because a licensed, experienced personal injury lawyer reviewed the case and decided Tessica Brown had a good one. All Brown has done so far is take to TikTok to warn her followers not to do what she did and retain a lawyer. More specifically, she put Gorilla Glue’s spray adhesive on her hair to hold a hairstyle in place as a stopgap measure when she was out of her regular hair care products.īy all accounts, Brown and her lawyer have not decided whether or not to pursue a lawsuit. If you’ve been paying attention to the news or to social media of late, you may have heard of Tessica Brown, a woman who put Gorilla Glue in her hair.